I was doing some light
dusting, the radio on in the background. They were discussing Will Young, who
had approached the Education Secretary over the relatively new, derogatory use
of the word ‘Gay’ in schools i.e. ‘That is so gay’ or ‘those shoes are gay’.
He has statistics ‘show 23% of young gay people attempt suicide and 56% will self
harm.’ These are worrying statistics but I find it hard to reconcile them with
a linguistic eddy over another layer of meaning in the word ‘Gay’. I would
imagine there is much more direct verbal abuse, as unacceptable as even more serious on-line
bullying. His suggestion that teachers should be ‘trained’ to stamp it out in
the playground will have as much success as Canute ordering the tide to go
back.
Language changes and officialdom – even
French officialdom – has little success in stopping it. I’m old enough to
remember when ‘Gay’ gained its new meaning. I remember the varying reactions,
ranging from the ‘intrigued’ to the ‘irritated’ that a fine old English word
could never be used again without this new connotation. To dance with ‘gay
abandon’ took on an entirely new meaning.
But then ‘Gay’ had been such a piffly little word,
old but underused. Now it became turbo-charged culturally and politically. The
language had changed.
And it changes again. In a new world
‘wicked’ and ‘bad’ have an extra layer of meaning. ‘That’s wicked’ or ‘that’s
bad’ means exactly the reverse, depending on context. The word ‘Gay’ has taken
on the same fate.
I don’t know. It may have begun as
consciously homophobic – some gay-baiting master-mind injecting it like a virus
into the playground. Somehow I doubt it, but then again language is hard to pin
down.
Whatever the origin of the changed use of ‘Gay’
I doubt that its casual use in today’s playground is consciously homophobic,
but I accept it has tainted a ‘brand’. The word ‘Gay’ was bravely appropriated
to mean something proud. This extra layer of meaning is unfortunate, but what
is appropriated can sometimes be re-appropriated in unexpected ways. In ten or
twenty years ‘gay’ may have an entirely new layer of meaning with or without teachers
being re-trained.
Will Young has every right to express his concern, and use his minor celebrity status to approach the Secretary of State for Education, but he should also be aware of its dangers. Writing as a teacher with some experience
of playground politics I fear such pleadings to officialdom for special
treatment reinforces the concept of ‘victim,’ – a far more tainted brand and something
Gay Pride resisted from its inception.
10 comments:
We have the same problem here. People are always trying to legislate 'correct' behavior. But there are plenty of laws to thwart bullying. All we have to do is enforce them--and punish the perpetrators without leniency.
You can't legislate 'correct' behaviour - or at least you shouldn't. As Edmund Burke put it: 'Manners are of more importance than laws. Upon them the laws depend.'
Similarly you can't or shouldn't legislate language.
In high school I learned that the word "gay" was equivalent to happy (what is now considered old English) LOL!
I am careful when and how I use this word nowadays since it could be politically incorrect (or correct). There are too many sensitive people in the world.
thought provoking blog, Mike. it's interesting how words change meaning over time...remember when 'we had a gay time' meant 'fun'? no more using that word...and thank you for commenting on my blog--I always appreciate what you have to say...
Thing is, Claudia, it's always best to speak your mind with a nod to good manners. It's pointless to second guess those who want to take offense.
Thanks, Nikki. I'm always intrigued by the post writing process, which is why I enjoy your various strategms. It seems hard work and imagination are called for :)
I fear outlawing a word only gives it more power, and even if it could be eliminated from our language, another will simply take its place.
My sister's name is Gay, a lovely English name. When the meaning changed (was it in the 70's?) she endured ignorant comments from some of the insensitive louts in her small town. Since then, she has been known by her middle name, Diane, which is also a lovely name. Still, it's a pity.
Interesting comment, Jeanne. The word is now a two edged sword. That's the problem and the glory of language. It doesn't take prisoners - and I don't think it should be stopped in that respect. Mind you it doesn't help having it wielded by the sub literate. During a recent paedophile crisis in this country a paediatrician in Newport had her surgery door daubed with paedo scum. I'm sure the world has always been so interesting.
Too right, Linda. Until 1984 arrives (and I fear 'newspeak' is almost upon us) unrestricted language is a right to be preserved.
Post a Comment