Can anything good come out of Birkenhead? A rhetorical question answered
perhaps by Cammel Lairds and F. E Smith.
But then again, it was Cammel Lairds who
built the Titanic whereas F. E Smith drowned in alcohol. He did though escape from
Birkenhead.
After a fairly dodgy start he rose to become a fellow of Oxbridge, a
lawyer who took no prisoners, an equally ruthless MP, and, at 47 the youngest
Lord Chancellor in memory. His response held an element of prophecy: “Should I
be drunk as a lord or sober as a judge?” He died in 1930 from Cirrhosis of the
liver.
Some attribute this to thwarted political ambition. He may have been the
youngest Lord Chancellor but though prestigious, it was also a political
cul-de-sac. From 1919, other than a
brief year of sobriety, his drinking was prodigious— something Lady Curzon
experienced first hand.
After Smith, in effect called her husband a liar, she came across him at
a ball, and took great pleasure in snubbing him but, in her words, he was "too drunk to
notice."
It hadn’t always been so. The historian George Dangerfield describes F.E
Smith as a young man. His description and the Spy Cartoons give a wonderful
impression:
“He was tall, dark, slender and a little over-dressed. His eyes and hair
were lustrous; the first from nature, the second from too much oil. His mouth
had always a slightly contemptuous droop; his voice was a beautiful drawl. He
had acquired, not diligently but with too much ease, the airs of a fox-hunting
man who could swear elegantly in Greek. Many people loved him, most distrusted
him, some despised him, and he despised almost everybody.”
His quickness of mind and verbal ripostes reinforce the picture of a man
who didn’t tolerate fools.
A 1924 entry in Evelyn Waugh’s diary described how an English High Court
judge presiding in a sodomy case sought advice on sentencing from Lord
Birkenhead. "Could you tell me," he asked, "what do you think
one ought to give a man who allows himself to be buggered?" Birkenhead
replied without hesitation, "Oh, thirty shillings or two pounds: whatever
you happen to have on you.”
This particular judge got off lightly. On other occasions he could be a
little more cutting:
Judge: You are extremely offensive, young man!
Smith: As a matter of fact we
both are; and the only difference between us is that I am trying to be, and you
can't help it.
Judge: I've listened to you for an hour and I'm none wiser.
Smith: None the wiser, perhaps, my lord but certainly better informed.
Judge: What do you suppose I am
on the bench for?
Smith: It is not for me, Your
Honour, to attempt to fathom the inscrutable workings of Providence.
Nor was it for him to get too
worked up about sexuality. He might have used Roger Casement’s buggery of boys
as ammunition when prosecuting him for treason, but dismissed calls to
criminalise lesbianism on the basis that ninety nine women in a thousand had "never
even heard a whisper of these practices."
He was not infallible, remarking
about India that to him it was ‘frankly inconceivable that India will ever be
fit for Dominican self-government. At the same time he had a degree of
prescience when he also observed:
“The greater the political progress made by the
Hindus, the greater, in my judgement, will be the Moslem discontent and
antagonism. All the conferences in the world cannot bridge over the
unbridgeable, and between those two countries lies a chasm which cannot be
crossed by the resources of modern political engineering.”
As Lord Chancellor he savaged the mine owners in the
1926 General Strike:
“It would be possible to say
without exaggeration that the miners' leaders were the stupidest men in England
if we had not frequent occasion to meet the owners.”
A year later it was the
Unions, when he attacked mass picketing:
“We are asked to permit a
hundred men to go round to the house of a man who wishes to exercise the common
law right in this country to sell his labour where and when he chooses, and to
'advise' him or 'peacefully persuade' him not to work. If peaceful persuasion
is the real object, why are a hundred men required to do it?”
Though he was a formidable
‘Class Warrior’ of the Right, his intellect and wit were acknowledged by a
future Labour leader, Clem Attlee, who may have chuckled at another F.E Smith
aphorism. Referring to Bolshevism, Smith
observed:
“Nature has no cure for this sort of madness, though I have known a legacy from a rich
relative work wonders.” Cynical but the key to the Establishment’s success in
turning too many Labour politicians into hypocrites.
At a smart party a lady approached Smith and pompously
told him ‘My name is Porter-Porter, with a hyphen. He replied ‘Mine is Whiskey
Whiskey, with a siphon.
‘He is very clever but sometimes his brains go to his head’ Margot
Asquith
“Churchill has spent the best years of his
life preparing impromptu remarks.”
Sir, if you were my husband, I would
poison your drink.”
“Madam, if you were my wife, I would
drink it.”
Exchange between Lady
Astor and Lord Birkenhead—
2 comments:
re: If peaceful persuasion is the real object, why are a hundred men required to do it?”
Ack! Right to the jugular. He may have been a drunkard, but he was sharp drunk.
A sharp drunk sometimes has insights denied to the sober man. Mind you, it has never worked for me :)
Post a Comment