In this age of fear of giving
offence Tobias Smollett should be compulsory reading, in particular his letters
making up ‘Travels through France and Italy’. This man was a curmudgeon with a
capital C, a man who makes Basil Fawlty a model of reason and sanity in
comparison, a man who in 1763 embarked on a tour of France and Italy with his
wife and manservant. The journey gets of to a bad start even before he leaves
England:
‘I need not
tell you this is the worst road in England…The chambers are in general cold and
comfortless, the beds paltry, the cooking execrable, the wine poison…the
publicans insolent and bills extortion…Dover is a den of thieves.’
He’s in for a treat in France.
But first he has to get there, and
he’s not very impressed by the boat:
'The cabin
was so small that a dog could hardly turn in it, and the beds put me in mind of
the holes described in some catacombs.'
French inns are worse, and
Smollett doesn’t mince his words: (here) 'one finds
nothing but dirt and imposition.' One of his hosts is ‘a true Frenchman in vanity, which is undoubtedly the ruling
passion of this people.' He extolls the virtues of French food, with the
exception of fish because by the time it has been transported inland is in ‘such mortified condition, that no other people except the
Negroes on the coast of Guinea would feed upon it.’ At first I assumed this was an example of ignorant and misplaced certainty. And I was wrong. Smollett was a well-travelled
man and there are some wonderful tidbits on the eating habits of various peoples
throughout the book.
His bad tempered analysis of France
is laughably unpleasant. It’s also sharp and makes clear why, twenty or so
years later,there was a French revolution.
If French peasants are filthy and
villainous. The French nobility fare no better:
‘I know not more insignificant set of mortals
than the noblesse of Boulogne; helpless in themselves and useless to the
community.’
This is the wonderful thing about
Smollet, his scattergun offence approach. Every race and culture gets it in the
neck—even as an aside:
'If there is
no cleanliness among these people, much less shall we find delicacy…Indeed they
are utter strangers to what we call common decency; and I could give you some
high-flavoured instances, at which even a native of Edinburgh would stop his
nose.' I’m guessing he’s talking about toilet habits here—and my
apologies to Edinburgh.
Smollett’s indignation knows no
bounds when he describes a fine lady escorted to the ‘house of office’ by her admirer, who
stands outside the door uttering pleasantries to her while she conducts her
business.
As Christopher Hibbert observed: ‘Always prepared for the worst, Smollett generally succeeded
in finding it.’ Perhaps that accounts for his habit of demanding the
bill with his sword in one hand and his cane in another. He hates innkeepers
French ones especially. Their food was ‘obnoxious’ and landlords are variously
described as assassins, waiters as ‘stark staring mad.’
This is a wonderfully intemperate
book and I’m still only halfway through France. Italy, in Smollett’s view is
even worse. I can’t wait. I hope I’ve whetted your appetite. You enter a very
special mind when you read Travels
through France and Italy, and glimpse xenophobia in full and glorious flood.
Smollett is in turn observant, wilful, insensitive and opinionative; above all,
robust. A Briton voicing his thoughts
without looking over his shoulder. Even so, one wonders throughout what his
wife thought.
4 comments:
Hi Mike,
First of all, I want to congratulate you on your novel! That's excellent!
As you may have noticed, I haven't been blogging much; therefore, I was not aware of your published book.
Is it an e-book?
Wishing you much success on your novel!
Thank you Claudia. It's good to hear from you again.. I'll send you a link to my Amazon 'author page' :)
Ha! I've already got an opinionated husband, I don't need to read about another one. His poor wife!
A husband without opinions doesn't bear thinking about
Post a Comment