Ever since, I have wanted to serve on a jury, later as a fine excuse for a paid holiday
from work. There were other reasons. It seems to be that to be on a jury constitutes one of the great
significant events of life, deciding on the guilt or innocence of another human
being. Then there is the ritual, the pageantry, and wigs.
I admit though a weakness. I’m easily swayed. The Defence and Prosecution would have be
swaying like a palm tree in a stiff breeze, and when they came to their closing
arguments, my mind would be flickering this way and that like strobe lighting at
a badly run disco.
This
wouldn’t have been the case had I been on a Jury in Chorley over recent months. Despite the tragic context, it would have been fun watching the Defence trying to make a go of it, the
Prosecution salivating over their good luck, even holding back a little. It
would have been fun wondering how the woman on trial—Sharon Edwards— had managed to find a
Defence Lawyer in the first place, considering what happened to the last one
she had come into contact with.
She
married him.
Two
months later he was dead.
The
poor man would regularly come into work bruised and covered in bite marks. Once
she threw a coffee table at him. It’s hardly surprising that he turned to
alcohol and subsequently lost his job in ‘rationalisation.’This however made
things worse, the bullying becoming, if possible, more intense.
The day
before he was murdered, she was seen in a pub, slapping her husband across the
head and calling him a ‘Dickhead.’ On the way home they were cautioned by a
policeman, wearing a body camera, which picked up the following exchange: she
turning to her husband and screeching, “I’m going to F……g kill you!” Her screeching
continued, culminating in ‘I swear, David, when I wake up tomorrow, I don’t
know what mood I’ll be in.” The following day her husband’s body was found in
bed stabbed through the heart. He had 60 external injuries of which 30 were
incised or prod wounds. These included stab wounds to his thigh, finger and a
shallow wound to his scalp. A thirteen inch knife was found close to the body.
Her
lawyer, David Fish, tried—God Bless him. Amongst items dredged up for the defence was their wedding video from Las Vegas, where she had called him her 'soul-mate,' and he had worn
makeup to cover a bruise. She also claimed that on the night in question
he had spiked her drink with Diazepam, and that as a result she could not
remember a thing.
Anne
Whyte, QC for the prosecution went in for the kill, in a manner of speaking:
Anne Whyte: “Your husband dies in your bed from a fatal
stab wound to his heart that has happened accidentally?”
Sharon
Edwards: “Yes.”
Miss
Whyte: “It is a wound caused by a
knife that has gone three inches into his chest, and you hadn’t realised what had happened?”
Sharon Edwards:
“I hadn’t realised.”
Miss
Whyte: “Although
there was an enormous amount of blood on his chest?”
Sharon
Edwards: “I didn’t.’
The
jury listened intently as Mrs Edwards claimed that her husband had picked up
the knife and held it to his own neck before walking towards her. She had taken
the knife from him and he ‘walked into to it.’
And why
hadn’t she phoned 999 right away? Her husband had told her not to.
David Edwards had been a popular lawyer in the Chorley area, and respected by the legal profession in which he served. I imagine for those involved in the trial, it must have been analogous to having a cop-killer brought into the station. She was found guilty and given twenty years.
2 comments:
Only 20 years?
I've never understood why anyone would take that much abuse (from a man or woman).
Humans are complicated. I can think of no other answer. Would there be tragedy if we were simple?
Post a Comment