On
the evening of June 18th 1815 the Duke of Wellington and Lord
Uxbridge were riding side by side when a stray volley of grapeshot struck
Uxbridge's right leg. Lord Uxbridge turned to the Duke and said:
By
God, Sir! I've lost my leg
And
Wellington
replied:
"By
God, Sir! So you have."
Lord Uxbridge
The battle of Waterloo saw others less fortunate. 55,000 were killed or wounded. In one
key respect it was worse than the first day of the Battle
of the Somme. There 234 lay injured per mile
of front. At Waterloo
2,291 lay injured per mile of front - many left bleeding to death. A few days later the London dentists arrived and extracted their teeth, revolutionising dentistry.
Waterloo Teeth
All a far cry from the evening before at the Duchess of Richmond's Ball:
Brilliantly
evoked in Thackery's 'Vanity Fair' but the pictures are good too.
Bad news. Napoleon is almost upon them. Party-pooper!
We're coming for you Party-pooper!
Michael
Crumplin, in his book, The Bloody Fields of Waterloo reveals that there were
2000 amputations that evening and the following day. The amputation was usually
conducted standing up for speed was essential.
In Crumplin's words:
"They
would cut the flesh with large capital amputation knives and then divide the
bone with a saw. That would take only a few minutes but then you had to make
sure you had control of all the arteries, which had to be tied off
individually. Then you would dress the wound. In all it would take about
fifteen minutes." (About the
time needed to make and eat a round of cheese on toast.) Just as well because
there were no anaesthetics other than spirits and on rare occasions, a small
dose of opium.
Lord
Uxbridge apparently didn't flinch, except on the one occasion the saw jammed on
the bone. The leg was buried in the garden where the amputation took place, and
a plaque marking the spot was a tourist attraction for some years.
Crumplin
makes the point that most injuries were from spent musket balls that penetrated
the skin. "Being round, although
they didn't have the destructive power of modern bullets, they did carry items
of clothing into the wound - cloth infested with bacteria - which was a huge
problem." It was why soldiers
queued for the surgeon's saw. After twenty years of warfare they had seen the
speed of gangrene, and its horrific effects.
One
final, interesting statistic from Crumplin's book is that of the 6,800 men
wounded at Waterloo,
75% of them had rejoined their regiments by 1816. Injury and death were
obviously preferable to the alternative as an agricultural labourer. Their officers,
equally brave but having more options, resumed their dancing.
4 comments:
That exchange reminds me of a Monty Python sketch where the soldier lost his leg while insisting it was only a flesh wound. :D
I can't believe they pulled the teeth off all those dead men.
Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Classic. I love the line 'Can still give you a nasty bite."
The Wellington teeth creep me out. What if you were wearing the teeth of a Frenchman? (Sorry, that is a joke in case anyone without humour reads this)
Hahaha Wellington's response made my day. :-D
It's actually surprising to think that people would willingly line up for amputation without anesthesia, but then, that probably was better than a horrible death.
Misha, it doesn't bear thinking about😁
Post a Comment